Different authors coincide in affirming that, in transitional contexts, the construction of collective memory should not be oriented to establishing a common, unified or, official account of past events but rather to composing a plural account in which different narratives could have a place. However, such multiplicity becomes problematic when antagonistic visions of the past are encountered, especially when the narrative defended by victimised groups collides with the state narrative, creating a situation that hinders the relationship between the parties. Precisely redirecting this type of relationships in a positive way is what is intended when speaking of social reconciliation processes in post-conflict situations.
From that perspective, this presentation addresses the impact of antagonistic or competitive mnemonic discourses on the process of social reconciliation in Colombia, analysing the specific case of two relevant actors for the construction of collective memory in the country. On the one hand, we study the concept of memory and its discursive application in the collective practice of the Movement of Victims of State Crimes (Movice). To that end, applying critical discourse analysis, we evaluate the material gathered from a focus group developed in 2019 with members of Movice. On the other hand, we review the narrative strategy exhibited by the National Centre for Historical Memory, specifically in the communications and public events developed by this institution since 2019.
Although the focus of the presentation is primarily descriptive, it also aims to share arguments that could contribute to the debate about the relationship between collective memory and reconciliation, particularly when groups that have not participated in hostilities but are essential for social reconstruction are involved.
